Title |
Visualizing the pressure and time burden of intracranial hypertension in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-3806-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fabian Güiza, Bart Depreitere, Ian Piper, Giuseppe Citerio, Iain Chambers, Patricia A. Jones, Tsz-Yan Milly Lo, Per Enblad, Pelle Nillson, Bart Feyen, Philippe Jorens, Andrew Maas, Martin U. Schuhmann, Rob Donald, Laura Moss, Greet Van den Berghe, Geert Meyfroidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 3 | 20% |
Australia | 2 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Singapore | 1 | 7% |
Argentina | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
France | 1 | 7% |
Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 218 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 15% |
Researcher | 22 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
Other | 56 | 25% |
Unknown | 49 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 44% |
Neuroscience | 16 | 7% |
Engineering | 8 | 4% |
Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 11% |
Unknown | 61 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,295,118
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,768
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,513
of 282,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#7
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.