↓ Skip to main content

スギ花粉症におけるアウトカム研究(第4報) : 就労者におけるスギ花粉症の労働生産性に対する影響

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
スギ花粉症におけるアウトカム研究(第4報) : 就労者におけるスギ花粉症の労働生産性に対する影響
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, July 2005
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.54.627
Authors

角谷 千恵子, 荻野 敏, 池田 浩己, 榎本 雅夫

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#72
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,339
of 67,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.