↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Risk-Based Hepatitis C Screening and the True Seroprevalence in an Urban Prison System

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Risk-Based Hepatitis C Screening and the True Seroprevalence in an Urban Prison System
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11524-015-9945-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danica E. Kuncio, E. Claire Newbern, Marcelo H. Fernandez-Viña, Bruce Herdman, Caroline C. Johnson, Kendra M. Viner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Social Sciences 9 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,000,795
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#275
of 1,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,673
of 262,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.