Title |
A note on “The no alternatives argument” by Richard Dawid, Stephan Hartmann and Jan Sprenger
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal for Philosophy of Science, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13194-014-0092-7 |
Authors |
Frederik Herzberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 1 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,664,464
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#68
of 275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,454
of 228,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them