↓ Skip to main content

Increase in calf post-occlusive blood flow and strength following short-term resistance exercise training with blood flow restriction in young women

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
Title
Increase in calf post-occlusive blood flow and strength following short-term resistance exercise training with blood flow restriction in young women
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00421-009-1309-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen D. Patterson, Richard. A. Ferguson

Abstract

The response of calf muscle strength, resting (R (bf)) and post-occlusive (PO(bf)) blood flow were investigated following 4 weeks resistance training with and without blood flow restriction in a matched leg design. Sixteen untrained females performed unilateral plantar-flexion low-load resistance training (LLRT) at either 25% (n = 8) or 50% (n = 8) one-repetition maximum (1 RM). One limb was trained with unrestricted blood flow whilst in the other limb blood flow was restricted with the use of a pressure applied cuff above the knee (110 mmHg). Regardless of the training load, peak PO(bf), measured using venous occlusion plethysmography increased when LLRT was performed with blood flow restriction compared to no change following LLRT with unrestricted blood flow. A significant increase (P < 0.05) in the area under the blood time-flow curve was also observed following LLRT with blood flow restriction when compared LLRT with unrestricted blood flow. No changes were observed in R (bf) between groups following training. Maximal dynamic strength (1 RM), maximal voluntary contraction and isokinetic strength at 0.52 and 1.05 rad s(-1) also increased (P < 0.05) by a greater extent following resistance training with blood flow restriction. Moreover, 1 RM increased to a greater extent following training at 50% 1 RM compared to 25% 1 RM. These results suggest that 4 weeks LLRT with blood flow restriction provides a greater stimulus to increase peak PO(bf) as well as strength parameters than LLRT with unrestricted blood flow.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 329 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 19%
Student > Bachelor 61 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 10%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Researcher 22 6%
Other 61 18%
Unknown 71 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 120 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 83 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,978,775
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#649
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,681
of 175,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.