↓ Skip to main content

Conscious thought beats deliberation without attention in diagnostic decision-making: at least when you are an expert

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
Conscious thought beats deliberation without attention in diagnostic decision-making: at least when you are an expert
Published in
Psychological Research, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00426-010-0281-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sílvia Mamede, Henk G. Schmidt, Remy M. J. P. Rikers, Eugene J. F. M. Custers, Ted A. W. Splinter, Jan L. C. M. van Saase

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 220 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 16%
Student > Master 36 16%
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 8%
Other 62 27%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 81 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 17%
Social Sciences 26 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 31 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,604,124
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#102
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,331
of 95,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them