↓ Skip to main content

Effect of levosimendan in patients with acute decompensated heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Herz, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Effect of levosimendan in patients with acute decompensated heart failure
Published in
Herz, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00059-018-4693-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Zhou, L. Zhang, J. Li

Abstract

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Intravenous inotropic agents play an important role in treating ADHF. Relatively small clinical studies have evaluated the effects of levosimendan, a positive inotropic agent with calcium-sensitizing effects, in ADHF. The present meta-analysis pooled these studies to assess the clinical efficacy of levosimendan in ADHF. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.com databases were systematically searched for prospective clinical studies published in English up to May 2017 on effects of levosimendan alone or versus other agents (placebo [glucose], dopamine, furosemide) on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, and heart rate (HR) in patients with ADHF. Seven articles were selected with 132 patients for levosimendan and 125 patients for control groups. Compared with controls (except dopamine) or after vs. before use, levosimendan was associated with a significantly reduced BNP level (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.92, -0.48; p = 0.000; I2 = 22.0%), as well as improved LVEF (SMD: 0.47; 95%CI: 0.12, 0.81; p = 0.008; I2 = 63.3%) and increased HR (SMD: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.63; p = 0.002; I2 = 23.6%) when comparing after vs. before use but not in comparisons to controls. In the present meta-analysis, levosimendan infusion in patients with ADHF appeared to reduce BNP regardless of the comparator (except for dopamine), and also improve LVEF and increase HR in after vs. before use comparisons but not compared to controls. Future larger studies on the benefit of levosimendan in ADHF patients are warranted.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,509,310
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Herz
#376
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,511
of 329,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Herz
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.