↓ Skip to main content

Experimental scoliosis by epiphysiodesis in pigs

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, March 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Experimental scoliosis by epiphysiodesis in pigs
Published in
International Orthopaedics, March 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf00266028
Authors

J. L. Beguiristain, J. De Salis, A. Oriaifo, J. Cañadell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Argentina 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,610,011
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#431
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,690
of 6,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them