↓ Skip to main content

Banks of the coral Cladocora caespitosa (Anthozoa, Scleractinia) in the Adriatic Sea

Overview of attention for article published in Coral Reefs, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Banks of the coral Cladocora caespitosa (Anthozoa, Scleractinia) in the Adriatic Sea
Published in
Coral Reefs, October 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00338-003-0345-y
Authors

Petar Kružić, Antonieta Požar-Domac

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 4%
Brazil 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 48 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 26%
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 46%
Environmental Science 8 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,463,244
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#942
of 1,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,748
of 52,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.