| Title |
In quest of a systematic framework for unifying and defining nanoscience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-009-9632-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald A. Tomalia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 24% |
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 39 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#248
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,641
of 111,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.