| Title |
Combustion Kinetics of Athabasca Bitumen from 1D Combustion Tube Experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Resources Research, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11053-009-9095-z |
| Authors |
Xiaomeng Yang, Ian D. Gates |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 26% |
| Energy | 8 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,565,251
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Natural Resources Research
#36
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,899
of 93,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Resources Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them