You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Practical procedures for genetic manipulation systems for medermycin‐producing Streptomyces sp. AM‐7161
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Basic Microbiology, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1002/jobm.200900240 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Deng Huiqun, Cai Xiaofeng, Peng Jianxin, Hong Huazhu, Ichinose Koji, Li Aiying |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 56% |
Professor | 1 | 11% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 56% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 22% |
Chemistry | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,959,933
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Basic Microbiology
#76
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,258
of 88,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Basic Microbiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them