↓ Skip to main content

Preliminary Report on the Distribution of Callicebus oenanthe on the Eastern Feet of the Andes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Primatology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Preliminary Report on the Distribution of Callicebus oenanthe on the Eastern Feet of the Andes
Published in
International Journal of Primatology, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10764-009-9353-2
Authors

Antonio J. Bóveda-Penalba, Jan Vermeer, Fernando Rodrigo, Fernando Guerra-Vásquez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 53%
Environmental Science 9 15%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,708,493
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#557
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,486
of 94,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.