↓ Skip to main content

Detection of Genes with Atypical Nucleotide Sequence in Microbial Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Detection of Genes with Atypical Nucleotide Sequence in Microbial Genomes
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00239-001-0051-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean D. Hooper, Otto G. Berg

Abstract

Along the gene, nucleotides in various codon positions tend to exert a slight but observable influence on the nucleotide choice at neighboring positions. Such context biases are different in different organisms and can be used as genomic signatures. In this paper, we will focus specifically on the dinucleotide composed of a third codon position nucleotide and its succeeding first position nucleotide. Using the 16 possible dinucleotide combinations, we calculate how well individual genes conform to the observed mean dinucleotide frequencies of an entire genome, forming a distance measure for each gene. It is found that genes from different genomes can be separated with a high degree of accuracy, according to these distance values. In particular, we address the problem of recent horizontal gene transfer, and how imported genes may be evaluated by their poor assimilation to the host's context biases. By concentrating on the third- and succeeding first position nucleotides, we eliminate most spurious contributions from codon usage and amino-acid requirements, focusing mainly on mutational effects. Since imported genes are expected to converge only gradually to genomic signatures, it is possible to question whether a gene present in only one of two closely related organisms has been imported into one organism or deleted in the other. Striking correlations between the proposed distance measure and poor homology are observed when Escherichia coli genes are compared to Salmonella typhi, indicating that sets of outlier genes in E. coli may contain a high number of genes that have been imported into E. coli, and not deleted in S. typhi.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Professor 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Computer Science 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,702,669
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#239
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,991
of 221,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.