| Title |
Thermal osteonecrosis and bone drilling parameters revisited
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00402-007-0427-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Goran Augustin, Slavko Davila, Kristijan Mihoci, Toma Udiljak, Denis Stjepan Vedrina, Anko Antabak |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 21% |
| Unknown | 44 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 82 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 27% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 2% |
| Design | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 54 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,411,714
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#210
of 1,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,966
of 76,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,387 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.