↓ Skip to main content

High Incidence of Squeaking in THAs with Alumina Ceramic‐on‐ceramic Bearings

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
High Incidence of Squeaking in THAs with Alumina Ceramic‐on‐ceramic Bearings
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0177-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. C. Keurentjes, R. M. Kuipers, D. J. Wever, B. W. Schreurs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 77 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Other 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 48%
Engineering 15 18%
Materials Science 5 6%
Psychology 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,440
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,770
of 95,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.