↓ Skip to main content

Swapped green algal promoters: aphVIII-based gene constructs with Chlamydomonas flanking sequences work as dominant selectable markers in Volvox and vice versa

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Swapped green algal promoters: aphVIII-based gene constructs with Chlamydomonas flanking sequences work as dominant selectable markers in Volvox and vice versa
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00299-006-0121-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Hallmann, S. Wodniok

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 9%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 32%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Engineering 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#780
of 2,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,034
of 155,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.