↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for agrobiodiversity conservation and promotion: a case from Yunnan, China

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for agrobiodiversity conservation and promotion: a case from Yunnan, China
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1023085922265
Authors

Chun-Lin Long, Heng Li, Zhiqin Ouyang, Xiangyun Yang, Qin Li, Bruce Trangmar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 105 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 20%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 27 24%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 43%
Environmental Science 22 19%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,179
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,499
of 53,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.