| Title |
Microscale 3D flow mapping with μDDPIV
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experiments in Fluids, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00348-007-0267-5 |
| Authors |
Francisco Pereira, Jian Lu, Emilio Castaño-Graff, Morteza Gharib |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 30% |
| Researcher | 16 | 26% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 30 | 49% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,746,777
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#163
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,680
of 77,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them