| Title |
Evaluation of different approaches for estimating and mapping crop water status in cotton with thermal imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Precision Agriculture, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11119-009-9111-7 |
| Authors |
V. Alchanatis, Y. Cohen, S. Cohen, M. Moller, M. Sprinstin, M. Meron, J. Tsipris, Y. Saranga, E. Sela |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 203 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 12% |
| Engineering | 24 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 53 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Precision Agriculture
#107
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,251
of 93,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Precision Agriculture
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.