↓ Skip to main content

Combination of miRNA and RNA functions as potential biomarkers for gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Combination of miRNA and RNA functions as potential biomarkers for gastric cancer
Published in
Tumor Biology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3756-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silin Chen, Jiaming Zhu, Feifei Yu, Yuxi Tian, Shumei Ma, Xiaodong Liu

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The optimal treatment regimens for GC depend on tumor stage, histopathological subtype, and other factors. The detection of tumor biomarkers is a quick way to get information of the tumor state. In this study, new biomarkers are detected for GC diagnostic and prognostic purposes. A total of 305 cases of diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled, microRNAs (miRNAs) and their transcriptome sequencing data were obtained from the "The Cancer Genome Atlas." Blood samples were collected from GC patients before surgery and therapy. The miRNA levels and the expression of RNA were detected by real-time RT-PCR. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of biomarkers. The combining predictors were established with the logistic regression analysis. Hundreds of miRNA were with higher area under curve (AUC) than 0.5; among them, nine miRNAs were with the highest AUC more than 0.90 and displayed strong diagnostic value. Moreover, the mir-17 level was correlated with tumor stage (p = 0.029), while mir-133b, mir-133a-2, and mir-1-2 levels were significantly correlated with race, tumor pathologic, and tumor stage (p < 0.05). The combination biomarker (mir-181a-1/KAT2B with a sensitivity of 95.83 % and specificity of 94.12 %) could be used as an independent diagnostic indicator for GC patients. For GC patients, mir-17, mir-133b, mir-133a-2, and mir-1-2 appear to be a potential novel predictor of tumor stage and preoperative and intraoperative diagnosis. The combination of miRNA and mRNA such as mir-181a-1/KAT2B (with a sensitivity of 95.83 % and specificity of 94.12 %) showed significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,765,819
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,219
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,739
of 262,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#64
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.