↓ Skip to main content

The robotic mouse: Unravelling the function of AF4 in the cerebellum

Overview of attention for article published in The Cerebellum, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
The robotic mouse: Unravelling the function of AF4 in the cerebellum
Published in
The Cerebellum, December 2005
DOI 10.1080/14734220500325897
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuelle Bitoun, Kay Elizabeth Davies

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Neuroscience 3 11%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,049,987
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Cerebellum
#111
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,473
of 151,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Cerebellum
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them