↓ Skip to main content

Nanoneoadjuvant Therapy of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Nanoneoadjuvant Therapy of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2009
DOI 10.1245/s10434-009-0316-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald P. DeMatteo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 60%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,672
of 6,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,004
of 171,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.