↓ Skip to main content

Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
923 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
Title
Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00227183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott T. Grafton, Michael A. Arbib, Luciano Fadiga, Giacomo Rizzolatti

Abstract

Positron emission tomography imaging of cerebral blood flow was used to localize brain areas involved in the representation of hand grasping movements. Seven normal subjects were scanned under three conditions. In the first, they observed precision grasping of common objects performed by the examiner. In the second, they imagined themselves grasping the objects without actually moving the hand. These two tasks were compared with a control task of object viewing. Grasp observation activated the left rostral superior temporal sulcus, left inferior frontal cortex (area 45), left rostral inferior parietal cortex (area 40), the rostral part of left supplementary motor area (SMA-proper), and the right dorsal premotor cortex. Imagined grasping activated the left inferior frontal (area 44) and middle frontal cortex, left caudal inferior parietal cortex (area 40), a more extensive response in left rostral SMA-proper, and left dorsal premotor cortex. The two conditions activated different areas of the right posterior cerebellar cortex. We propose that the areas active during grasping observation may form a circuit for recognition of hand-object interactions, whereas the areas active during imagined grasping may be a putative human homologue of a circuit for hand grasping movements recently defined in nonhuman primates. The location of responses in SMA-proper confirms the rostrocaudal segregation of this area for imagined and real movement. A similar segregation is also present in the cerebellum, with imagined and observed grasping movements activating different parts of the posterior lobe and real movements activating the anterior lobe.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 1%
Japan 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 273 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 21%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 121 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 23%
Neuroscience 29 10%
Engineering 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 128 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,317,840
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#856
of 3,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,690
of 29,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.