↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose Human Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Given from the Beginning of Cardiopulmonary Bypass for Thoracic Aortic Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Surgery Today, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose Human Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Given from the Beginning of Cardiopulmonary Bypass for Thoracic Aortic Surgery
Published in
Surgery Today, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00595-006-3194-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akira Sezai, Motomi Shiono, Mitsumasa Hata, Mitsuru Iida, Shinji Wakui, Masao Soeda, Nanao Negishi, Yukiyasu Sezai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 75%
Materials Science 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Surgery Today
#149
of 1,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,559
of 86,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery Today
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.