↓ Skip to main content

Stereotactic implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes: a review of technical systems, methods and emerging tools

Overview of attention for article published in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stereotactic implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes: a review of technical systems, methods and emerging tools
Published in
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11517-010-0633-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Hemm, Karin Wårdell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 28 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Neuroscience 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#547
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,286
of 105,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.