↓ Skip to main content

Effects of ozonated autohemotherapy on the antioxidant capacity of Thoroughbred horses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of ozonated autohemotherapy on the antioxidant capacity of Thoroughbred horses
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, July 2015
DOI 10.1292/jvms.15-0225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nao TSUZUKI, ENDO Yoshiro, Lisa KIKKAWA, Kenji KOROSUE, Yasuyuki KANEKO, Akira KITAUCHI, Hiromu KATAMOTO, Yuichi HIDAKA, Mitsuyoshi HAGIO, Shidow TORISU

Abstract

The performance of horses undergoing regular intense exercise is adversely affected by oxidative stress. Thus, it is important to increase antioxidant production in horses in order to reduce oxidative stress. Ozonated autohemotherapy (OAHT) reportedly promotes antioxidant production. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of OAHT on antioxidant capacity. Ten Thoroughbred horses were used in this study. After the OAHT, we collected serum samples and measured biological antioxidant potential (BAP). We found that BAP began to increase after the OAHT and was significantly higher in the OAHT group than at 3 (P<0.01) and 7 days (P<0.05) after OAHT than in the control group at 3 and 7 days after starting collection of blood samples. Therefore, it was shown that OAHT improved the antioxidant capacity of the horses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,354,664
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#233
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,896
of 277,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#3
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.