↓ Skip to main content

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure increments can be predicted by computer simulation based on a physiological profile in acute respiratory failure

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure increments can be predicted by computer simulation based on a physiological profile in acute respiratory failure
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00134-002-1620-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Uttman, L. Beydon, B. Jonson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Belgium 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Other 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 57%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,879
of 5,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,803
of 129,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.