| Title |
Phylogenetic analysis of long-chain hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria and evaluation of their hydrocarbon-degradation by the 2,6-DCPIP assay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodegradation, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10532-008-9179-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenzo Kubota, Daisuke Koma, Yoshiki Matsumiya, Seon-Yong Chung, Motoki Kubo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Biodegradation
#61
of 372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,782
of 80,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodegradation
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.