↓ Skip to main content

N-Application Methods and Precipitation Pattern Effects on Subsurface Drainage Nitrate Losses and Crop Yields

Overview of attention for article published in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
N-Application Methods and Precipitation Pattern Effects on Subsurface Drainage Nitrate Losses and Crop Yields
Published in
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11270-010-0322-3
Authors

Allah Bakhsh, Ramesh S. Kanwar, J. L. Baker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Ireland 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Master 4 19%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Engineering 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
#373
of 1,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,945
of 96,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.