| Title |
Sulphonylureas and cancer: a case–control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Diabetologica, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00592-008-0083-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Monami, Caterina Lamanna, Daniela Balzi, Niccolò Marchionni, Edoardo Mannucci |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#265
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,901
of 166,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.