| Title |
Correlated recovery of five lizard populations following eradication of invasive mammals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-013-0511-2 |
| Authors |
Joanne M. Monks, Adrian Monks, David R. Towns |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,512,427
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#2,263
of 2,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,363
of 195,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.