| Title |
Correlations in state space can cause sub-optimal adaptation of optimal feedback control models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10827-011-0350-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Aprasoff, Opher Donchin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 36% |
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 8 | 19% |
| Psychology | 7 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#69
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,569
of 120,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.