| Title |
Prevalence of Perceived Dysphagia and Quality-of-Life Impairment in a Geriatric Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-008-9156-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Po-Hung Chen, Justin S. Golub, Edie R. Hapner, Michael M. Johns |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#614
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,891
of 99,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.