↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Dysphagia on Quality of Life in Ageing and Parkinson’s Disease as Measured by the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) Questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
The Impact of Dysphagia on Quality of Life in Ageing and Parkinson’s Disease as Measured by the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) Questionnaire
Published in
Dysphagia, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00455-009-9245-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Pyn Leow, Maggie-Lee Huckabee, Tim Anderson, Lutz Beckert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 243 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 69 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 15%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 76 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#651
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,694
of 129,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.