↓ Skip to main content

Involvement of Sensory Input from Anterior Teeth in Deglutitive Tongue Function

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Involvement of Sensory Input from Anterior Teeth in Deglutitive Tongue Function
Published in
Dysphagia, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00455-007-9119-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saiko Yagi, Eiji Fukuyama, Kunimichi Soma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 21%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#597
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,460
of 83,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.