| Title |
Electrospun fibers for tissue engineering, drug delivery, and wound dressing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-013-7145-8 |
| Authors |
Yi-Fan Goh, Imran Shakir, Rafaqat Hussain |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 306 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 17% |
| Researcher | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 70 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 57 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 52 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 44 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 92 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#941
of 4,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,716
of 282,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.