| Title |
Information Entropy Measure for Evaluation of Image Quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-007-9044-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Du-Yih Tsai, Yongbum Lee, Eri Matsuyama |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 26% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 33 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#338
of 1,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,676
of 68,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,049 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them