↓ Skip to main content

Non-invasive imaging of roots with high resolution X-ray micro-tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
15 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Non-invasive imaging of roots with high resolution X-ray micro-tomography
Published in
Plant and Soil, August 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1026179919689
Authors

P.J. Gregory, D. J. Hutchison, D. B. Read, P. M. Jenneson, W. B. Gilboy, E. J. Morton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 141 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 27%
Researcher 30 20%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Professor 8 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 45%
Environmental Science 16 11%
Engineering 14 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 6%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#962
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,620
of 53,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.