↓ Skip to main content

Toxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in mouse keratinocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanoparticle Research, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Toxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in mouse keratinocytes
Published in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11051-008-9417-9
Authors

Kyung O. Yu, Christin M. Grabinski, Amanda M. Schrand, Richard C. Murdock, Wei Wang, Baohua Gu, John J. Schlager, Saber M. Hussain

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 32%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 24 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 15%
Engineering 19 15%
Materials Science 13 10%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#248
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,791
of 82,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.