↓ Skip to main content

Conductive metal–organic frameworks and networks: fact or fantasy?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conductive metal–organic frameworks and networks: fact or fantasy?
Published in
Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2012
DOI 10.1039/c2cp41099k
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher H. Hendon, Davide Tiana, Aron Walsh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 308 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 30%
Researcher 55 17%
Student > Master 33 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 54 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 173 54%
Materials Science 35 11%
Chemical Engineering 13 4%
Engineering 13 4%
Physics and Astronomy 11 3%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 66 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,693,470
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#3,348
of 17,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,359
of 251,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#34
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.