| Title |
High-Strength Low-Alloy (HSLA) Mg–Zn–Ca Alloys with Excellent Biodegradation Performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOM, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11837-014-0875-5 |
| Authors |
J. Hofstetter, M. Becker, E. Martinelli, A. M. Weinberg, B. Mingler, H. Kilian, S. Pogatscher, P. J. Uggowitzer, J. F. Löffler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 41 | 32% |
| Engineering | 30 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#64
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,238
of 320,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.