| Title |
Threshold fatigue and information transfer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10827-007-0033-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maurice J. Chacron, Benjamin Lindner, André Longtin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 31% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#27
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,182
of 88,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.