| Title |
Cell cycle and activation of CK2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11010-008-9823-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miwako Kato Homma, Yoshimi Homma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,770,911
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#197
of 2,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,074
of 82,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.