↓ Skip to main content

CO2 decomposition with oxygen-deficient Mn(II) ferrite

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, January 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
CO2 decomposition with oxygen-deficient Mn(II) ferrite
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, January 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00400881
Authors

Masahiro Tabata, Yoshikazu Nishida, Tatsuya Kodama, Keisuke Mimori, Takashi Yoshida, Yutaka Tamaura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 25%
Chemical Engineering 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#941
of 4,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,182
of 65,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#15
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.