| Title |
Cyclin D1 is overexpressed in atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor with hSNF5/INI1 gene inactivation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11060-004-4276-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hironori Fujisawa, Koichi Misaki, Yasushi Takabatake, Mitsuhiro Hasegawa, Junkoh Yamashita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,066
of 2,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,472
of 57,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,991 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.