↓ Skip to main content

Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group
Published in
Hernia, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10029-007-0214-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fritz H. Berndsen, U. Petersson, D. Arvidsson, C.-E. Leijonmarck, C. Rudberg, S. Smedberg, A. Montgomery

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 8 19%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 53%
Psychology 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#382
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,381
of 74,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them