↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of fish-eye lens models.

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Optics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of fish-eye lens models.
Published in
Applied Optics, June 2010
DOI 10.1364/ao.49.003338
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ciarán Hughes, Patrick Denny, Edward Jones, Martin Glavin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 101 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 27%
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 41 37%
Engineering 30 27%
Physics and Astronomy 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Design 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Applied Optics
#3,215
of 11,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,150
of 108,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Optics
#13
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,634 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.