↓ Skip to main content

Transthoracic echocardiography and mortality in sepsis: analysis of the MIMIC-III database

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Transthoracic echocardiography and mortality in sepsis: analysis of the MIMIC-III database
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00134-018-5208-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengling Feng, Jakob I. McSparron, Dang Trung Kien, David J. Stone, David H. Roberts, Richard M. Schwartzstein, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Leo Anthony Celi

Abstract

While the use of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in the ICU is rapidly expanding, the contribution of TTE to altering patient outcomes among ICU patients with sepsis has not been examined. This study was designed to examine the association of TTE with 28-day mortality specifically in that population. The MIMIC-III database was employed to identify patients with sepsis who had and had not received TTE. The statistical approaches utilized included multivariate regression, propensity score analysis, doubly robust estimation, the gradient boosted model, and an inverse probability-weighting model to ensure the robustness of our findings. Significant benefit in terms of 28-day mortality was observed among the TTE patients compared to the control (no TTE) group (odds ratio = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.90, p < 0.001). The amount of fluid administered (2.5 vs. 2.1 L on day 1, p < 0.001), use of dobutamine (2% vs. 1%, p = 0.007), and the maximum dose of norepinephrine (1.4 vs. 1 mg/min, p = 0.001) were significantly higher for the TTE patients. Importantly, the TTE patients were weaned off vasopressors more quickly than those in the no TTE group (vasopressor-free days on day 28 of 21 vs. 19, p = 0.004). In a general population of critically ill patients with sepsis, use of TTE is associated with an improvement in 28-day mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 15%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 40 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 39%
Engineering 11 7%
Computer Science 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 44 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,065,951
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,862
of 4,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,652
of 330,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#88
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.