You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epigenome data release: a participant-centered approach to privacy protection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0723-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie O. M. Dyke, Warren A. Cheung, Yann Joly, Ole Ammerpohl, Pavlo Lutsik, Mark A. Rothstein, Maxime Caron, Stephan Busche, Guillaume Bourque, Lars Rönnblom, Paul Flicek, Stephan Beck, Martin Hirst, Henk Stunnenberg, Reiner Siebert, Jörn Walter, Tomi Pastinen |
| Abstract |
Large-scale epigenome mapping by the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Project, the ENCODE Consortium and the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC) produces genome-wide DNA methylation data at one base-pair resolution. We examine how such data can be made open-access while balancing appropriate interpretation and genomic privacy. We propose guidelines for data release that both reduce ambiguity in the interpretation of open-access data and limit immediate access to genetic variation data that are made available through controlled access. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Canada | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 74% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,030,630
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,718
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,908
of 258,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#29
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.